US peace groups file constitutional challenge to Iraq war
Wednesday, May 14, 2008

[JURIST] A coalition of anti-war activists represented by the Constitutional Law Clinic at Rutgers University Law School-Newark [academic website] Tuesday filed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF; press release, PDF] in US District Court for New Jersey seeking a declaratory judgment that the war in Iraq ..

Tyco settles securities fraud lawsuit with New Jersey for $73 million
Thursday, May 1, 2008

[JURIST] Tyco International [corporate website] Wednesday reached an agreement with the state of New Jersey to settle a lawsuit [case materials] alleging that insider trading at the company cost the state $100 million in state employee pension funds. Under the settlement terms, Tyco will pay $73 ..

NY appeals court upholds Port Authority negligence verdict in 1993 WTC bombing
Wednesday, April 30, 2008

[JURIST] A New York appeals court has upheld [opinion text] a jury's finding that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey was negligent [JURIST report] in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center [BBC backgrounder] by Islamic radicals that killed six and injured 1,000. The jury found in ..

New Jersey high court rules subpoena needed to obtain Internet user records
Monday, April 21, 2008

[JURIST] The New Jersey Supreme Court [official website] Monday ruled [PDF text] that Internet service providers may not turn over users' personal information to police or other agencies unless they obtain a valid grand jury subpoena when the information sought relates to an indictable offense. ..

Parmalat fraud suit against Citigroup can proceed: judge
Tuesday, April 15, 2008

[JURIST] A New Jersey Superior Court judge ruled [PDF text] Tuesday that a $7 billion lawsuit [JURIST report] filed by Italian dairy giant Parmalat SpA [corporate website] against Citigroup [corporate website] could go forward on a claim that Citigroup aided and abetted former Parmalat executives ..

ICE sued over 'illegal' immigration raids
Thursday, April 3, 2008

[JURIST] Law enforcement officials from the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) [official website] violated the constitutional privacy and due process rights of suspected illegal aliens by raiding their homes [CSJ backgrounder], according to a complaint [PDF text] filed in New Jersey ..

Fort Dix plot accomplice sentenced to 20 months in prison
Monday, March 31, 2008

[JURIST] New Jersey US District Judge Robert Kugler Monday sentenced Albanian Kosovar refugee Agron Abdullahu [criminal complaint, PDF], one of the six men arrested [JURIST report] in May for plotting an attack on New Jersey's Fort Dix [official website], to 20 months in prison. In October 2007, ..

Supreme Court rules for Delaware in state water boundary dispute
Monday, March 31, 2008

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled Monday that New Jersey and Delaware have "overlapping authority" to control "extraordinary" construction projects along the Delaware River. The Court's decision came in New Jersey v. Delaware [Medill case backgrounder; ..

New Jersey civil union law not ensuring rights of same-sex couples: report
Tuesday, February 19, 2008

[JURIST] A New Jersey civil union law has not been able to effectively ensure that same-sex couples receive the same rights and privileges as heterosexual couples because of federal law, according to an official report [PDF text] issued Tuesday by the New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission (NJ- ..

Merck settles Medicaid fraud, kickback lawsuits
Friday, February 8, 2008

[JURIST] New Jersey pharmaceutical manufacturer Merck [corporate website] has agreed to pay $671 million to settle claims [press release, PDF] that it defrauded Medicaid and improperly marketed three of its drugs to doctors, federal prosecutors said Thursday. The settlement [PDF text] stems from ..

Fort Dix plot suspects charged with attempted murder
Wednesday, January 16, 2008

[JURIST] Additional charges, including attempted murder, were filed Tuesday against the alleged plotters of an attack on Fort Dix [official website]. The US Attorney for New Jersey declined to say why the attempted murder charge was added, but a grand jury found that there was sufficient evidence ..

Upholded by Feed Informer

19
Apr

Being a Defendant in a Car Accident

Recently someone contacted the firm regarding an accident in which they were at fault, but did not feel that there were any injuries. They essentially stated that “I was involved in a car accident in which I was stopped completely and then took my foot off the brake and bumped the car in front of me causing mere paint damage to the bumper. No medical treatment was sought by either party and the plaintiff appeared in perfect health with no complaints. I was served a summons filing a suit against me claiming ‘’severe and permanent injuries, ”great pain and suffering preventing them from pursuing their usual activities while incurring bills for medical treatment”. This is clearly a claim without merit. What are my rights and options as the defendant, considering there were no complaints of pain or injury or medical treatment at the scene and it is now two years since the accident? Thank you in advance.

As a result of this inquiry, the following was suggested……

I understand that you are troubled by the claim for damages. However, the accident is your fault and at this time, your only interest is to make sure that your insurance protects you and that you do not incur any personal financial losses.
Turn the complaint over to your insurance as soon as possible. They will provide a defense and are obligated to protect you. From your perspective that means settling the case within the policy limits. Demand that they not only protect you by providing a defense but also take whatever steps are necessary to resolve the claim within the policy limits.
While you may object in your mind to them paying a cent, that is not your primary concern. You paid for the insurance and the only benefit to them not paying to you would be in your own mind. Your insurance has already charged you for the accident. If the claim is bogus, usually the jury system works pretty well. If you are found liable, you want your insurance to pay, not you. By encouraging them to protect you and demanding that the case be resolved for the insurance you bought, if they chose not to do so, it is their risk, not yours. On the other hand, if you demanded that they not pay, the risk could be on you, not them. That is why there is no benefit to you saying that they should not pay.
This does not mean that they will pay the claim nor that they should. The question is not so much for you as to the merit, but who takes the risk.
Complaints are standard; don’t be shocked by the language. As to the seriousness of the injury, let your insurance determine this. There can be serious injuries in low impact cases and there can be none in high, it is harder to predict than you might think.
In any case, cooperate with your insurance and you should come out of it without any problems.

Leave a Reply