US peace groups file constitutional challenge to Iraq war
Wednesday, May 14, 2008

[JURIST] A coalition of anti-war activists represented by the Constitutional Law Clinic at Rutgers University Law School-Newark [academic website] Tuesday filed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF; press release, PDF] in US District Court for New Jersey seeking a declaratory judgment that the war in Iraq ..

Tyco settles securities fraud lawsuit with New Jersey for $73 million
Thursday, May 1, 2008

[JURIST] Tyco International [corporate website] Wednesday reached an agreement with the state of New Jersey to settle a lawsuit [case materials] alleging that insider trading at the company cost the state $100 million in state employee pension funds. Under the settlement terms, Tyco will pay $73 ..

NY appeals court upholds Port Authority negligence verdict in 1993 WTC bombing
Wednesday, April 30, 2008

[JURIST] A New York appeals court has upheld [opinion text] a jury's finding that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey was negligent [JURIST report] in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center [BBC backgrounder] by Islamic radicals that killed six and injured 1,000. The jury found in ..

New Jersey high court rules subpoena needed to obtain Internet user records
Monday, April 21, 2008

[JURIST] The New Jersey Supreme Court [official website] Monday ruled [PDF text] that Internet service providers may not turn over users' personal information to police or other agencies unless they obtain a valid grand jury subpoena when the information sought relates to an indictable offense. ..

Parmalat fraud suit against Citigroup can proceed: judge
Tuesday, April 15, 2008

[JURIST] A New Jersey Superior Court judge ruled [PDF text] Tuesday that a $7 billion lawsuit [JURIST report] filed by Italian dairy giant Parmalat SpA [corporate website] against Citigroup [corporate website] could go forward on a claim that Citigroup aided and abetted former Parmalat executives ..

ICE sued over 'illegal' immigration raids
Thursday, April 3, 2008

[JURIST] Law enforcement officials from the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) [official website] violated the constitutional privacy and due process rights of suspected illegal aliens by raiding their homes [CSJ backgrounder], according to a complaint [PDF text] filed in New Jersey ..

Fort Dix plot accomplice sentenced to 20 months in prison
Monday, March 31, 2008

[JURIST] New Jersey US District Judge Robert Kugler Monday sentenced Albanian Kosovar refugee Agron Abdullahu [criminal complaint, PDF], one of the six men arrested [JURIST report] in May for plotting an attack on New Jersey's Fort Dix [official website], to 20 months in prison. In October 2007, ..

Supreme Court rules for Delaware in state water boundary dispute
Monday, March 31, 2008

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled Monday that New Jersey and Delaware have "overlapping authority" to control "extraordinary" construction projects along the Delaware River. The Court's decision came in New Jersey v. Delaware [Medill case backgrounder; ..

New Jersey civil union law not ensuring rights of same-sex couples: report
Tuesday, February 19, 2008

[JURIST] A New Jersey civil union law has not been able to effectively ensure that same-sex couples receive the same rights and privileges as heterosexual couples because of federal law, according to an official report [PDF text] issued Tuesday by the New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission (NJ- ..

Merck settles Medicaid fraud, kickback lawsuits
Friday, February 8, 2008

[JURIST] New Jersey pharmaceutical manufacturer Merck [corporate website] has agreed to pay $671 million to settle claims [press release, PDF] that it defrauded Medicaid and improperly marketed three of its drugs to doctors, federal prosecutors said Thursday. The settlement [PDF text] stems from ..

Fort Dix plot suspects charged with attempted murder
Wednesday, January 16, 2008

[JURIST] Additional charges, including attempted murder, were filed Tuesday against the alleged plotters of an attack on Fort Dix [official website]. The US Attorney for New Jersey declined to say why the attempted murder charge was added, but a grand jury found that there was sufficient evidence ..

Upholded by Feed Informer

28
Jul

HOW DOES THE VERBAL OR LAWSUIT THRESHOLD AFFECT A CLAIM FOR INJURY

When speaking to an attorney after you have been involved in a car accident, one of the most common questions asked of you is whether you have selected the “verbal threshold” (a/k/a the “limitation on lawsuit option”) on your auto insurance policy or the “No Threshold” (aka “no limitation on lawsuit” option. For many people, this may be the first time they are hearing these terms. However, it is one of the most important questions to be answered when determining whether a person has the right to sue for injuries when involved in a car accident.

Whether you understood it or not at the time, you were given the option to select either the Zero Tort Threshold (aka “no limitation”) or the Verbal Threshold (aka “Lawsuit Threshold”). If you selected the Zero Threshold, there is no threshold that has to be met by your injuries before you can pursue a claim for personal injury pain and suffering caused by the accident. The extent of the injuries will likely determine the value of the claim.

However, if you selected the Verbal Threshold, which is less expensive than the Zero Tort and the more common selection by residents of New Jersey, your ability to sue for personal injury pain and suffering hinges upon whether or not your injuries fall into one of these six categories: (1) Death; (2) Dismemberment; (3) Significant Disfiguring or Scarring; (4) Displaced Fracture(s); (5) Loss of a Fetus; OR (6) A permanent injury, other than scarring or disfigurement. If you have the Verbal/Lawsuit limitation option and cannot prove one of those injuries occurred, then there is no recovery for pain suffering or disability.

In cases governed by the Verbal Threshold, the medical treatment/records determine whether or not a person meets this threshold. Injuries that may fall within one of the previously mentioned categories must be supported by objective testing, such as an X-RAY, CT SCAN, MRI, EMG, or other medically accepted test. Then, your treating doctor, or a board certified doctor to whom you were referred by your treating doctor, must sign a certification, under penalty of perjury, stating that your injuries meet one of the above categories, and that the injuries were caused by the accident. A certification must be completed by the doctor for the claim to be viable.

Many times in a case governed by the Verbal Threshold, only time will determine whether the injuries fall within one of the enumerated categories, based upon the appropriate testing ordered by physicians as symptoms persist despite recommended medical treatment. In addition, only a doctor can support the allegation that the injuries came from the accident based on his/her certification. There are many times that people have pain and discomfort that they never had before they were involved in an accident. And there are also many complaints of pain and/or discomfort that a person may report to a doctor, but the complaints must be supported by objective testing as outlined above for the claim to be viable.

Lastly, the selection of the verbal Threshold applies to the policyholder, as well as most resident relatives. It makes no difference whether you were in your own car at the time of the accident, or whether you were in a car at all. If you are in an accident caused by a motor vehicle, your threshold selection on your auto policy determines if your right to sue for personal injury pain and suffering has been limited as outlined above.

The verbal threshold limits your right to sue here in New Jersey. Levinson Axelrod has been, and continues to pursue these cases if a person who has selected the verbal threshold meets the requirements. It is important to know what the verbal threshold is, its limitations, and whether this selection was in effect at the time of your accident.

We strongly urge all persons, where economically feasible, to select the No Threshold so that your rights are not unduly or unnaturally limited.

Feel free to contact one of our lawyers at 1-800-34-NJ-LAW to discuss this if you have other questions or need more information.

One Response to “HOW DOES THE VERBAL OR LAWSUIT THRESHOLD AFFECT A CLAIM FOR INJURY”

  1. 1
      HOW DOES THE VERBAL OR LAWSUIT THRESHOLD AFFECT A CLAIM FOR INJURY by insurance.ZapiZapi.com Says:

    […] the “No Threshold” (aka “no limitation on lawsuit” option. … article continues at Tara Johnson brought to you by insurance and […]

Leave a Reply